← Explorer/Network

Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, immune stimulation and host defence against infection

Rowe J, Ertelt J, Way S2012ImmunologyReview
10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03551.xPubMedFree full text
Immune/Innate
Mycobacteria

Abstract

SummaryThe immune system is intricately regulated allowing potent effectors to expand and become rapidly mobilized after infection, while simultaneously silencing potentially detrimental responses that averts immune‐mediated damage to host tissues. This relies in large part on the delicate interplay between immune suppressive regulatory CD4+ T (Treg) cells and immune effectors that without active suppression by Treg cells cause systemic and organ‐specific autoimmunity. Although these beneficial roles have been classically described as counterbalanced by impaired host defence against infection, newfound protective roles for Treg cells against specific viral pathogens (e.g. herpes simplex virus 2, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, West Nile virus) have been uncovered using transgenic mice that allow in vivo Treg‐cell ablation based on Foxp3 expression. In turn, Foxp3+ Treg cells also provide protection against some parasitic (Plasmodium sp., Toxoplasma gondii) and fungal (Candida albicans) pathogens. By contrast, for bacterial and mycobacterial infections (e.g. Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, Mycobacterium tuberculosis), experimental manipulation of Foxp3+ cells continues to indicate detrimental roles for Treg cells in host defence. This variance is probably related to functional plasticity in Treg cell suppression that shifts discordantly following infection with different types of pathogens. Furthermore, the efficiency whereby Treg cells silence immune activation coupled with the plasticity in Foxp3+ cell activity suggest that overriding Treg‐mediated suppression represents a prerequisite ‘signal zero’ that together with other stimulation signals [T‐cell receptor (signal 1), co‐stimulation (signal 2), inflammatory cytokines (signal 3)] are essential for T‐cell activation in vivo. Herein, the importance of Foxp3+ Treg cells in host defence against infection, and the significance of infection‐induced shifts in Treg‐cell suppression are summarized.

Key Biomarkers

CD4+ T cellsFoxp3+ regulatory T cellsImmune activation markersTreg cell suppression

References (3)

  • How regulatory T cells workNature reviews. Immunology · 2009
  • CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells Promote Th17 Cells In Vitro and Enhance Host Resistance in Mouse Candida albicans Th17 Cell Infection ModelImmunity · 2011
  • CD4+CD25+ T cells inhibit both the induction and effector function of auto-reactive T cells and represent a unique lineage of immunoregulatory cellsThe Journal of Immunology · 1998

Related Papers

  • Comparison of mycobacteria-induced cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses in human and mouse cell linesInhalation Toxicology · 2001 · 2 shared tags
  • Acylation Determines the Toll-like receptor (TLR)-dependent Positive Versus TLR2-, Mannose Receptor-, and SIGNR1-independent Negative Regulation of Pro-inflammatory Cytokines by Mycobacterial LipomannanJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2007 · 2 shared tags
  • Immune-reconstitution syndrome related to atypical mycobacterial infection in AIDSJournal of Thoracic Imaging · 2008 · 2 shared tags
  • The Pattern Recognition Receptor Dectin-1: From Fungi to MycobacteriaCurrent Drug Targets · 2008 · 2 shared tags
  • Bacteria, molds, and toxins in water-damaged building materialsApplied and Environmental Microbiology · 1997 · 2 shared tags
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipids regulate cytokines, TLR-2/4 and MHC class II expression in human macrophagesTuberculosis · 2008 ·
2 shared tags