This 2007 paper emphasizes that readers should systematically assess methods used to identify measure and analysis confounding in observations cohort studies. Studies looking at acquisition of illness in humans must include adequately matched cases and controls such that they are interchangeable; accurate recordation of symptoms and correlation with objective laboratory studies. Addition of genomic studies is of tremendous importance

Klein-Geltink JE; Rochon PA; Dyer S; Laxer M; Anderson GM

This 2007 paper emphasizes that readers should systematically assess methods used to identify measure and analysis confounding in observations cohort studies. Studies looking at acquisition of illness in humans must include adequately matched cases and controls such that they are interchangeable; accurate recordation of symptoms and correlation with objective laboratory studies. Addition of genomic studies is of tremendous importance

Klein-Geltink JE, Rochon PA, Dyer S +2 more2007Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies. J Clin Epidemiol

Summary

No abstract is available for this paper. It was published in Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies. J Clin Epidemiol in 2007 by Klein-Geltink JE and colleagues.

Part of CIRS Nexus · Curated by Lauren Lowenstein, The Biotoxin Lady