← Explorer/Network

Recent advances on the use of adsorbent materials for detoxification ofFusariummycotoxins

Giuseppina Avantaggiato, Michele Solfrizzo, Angelo Visconti2005Food Additives & ContaminantsJournal Article
10.1080/02652030500058312PubMed
Endocrine (ADH/ACTH/MSH)Gastrointestinal
Mycotoxins

Abstract

The extensive use of adsorbents in the livestock industry has led to the introduction of a wide range of new products on the market, most of them claiming high in vitro mycotoxin adsorption capacity. However, adsorbents that may appear effective in vitro do not necessarily retain their efficacy when tested in vivo. Studies performed in our laboratory during the past few years aiming to evaluate the efficacy of various adsorbent materials in binding Fusarium mycotoxins are reported. Adsorption experiments were performed in in vitro screening tests for Fusarium mycotoxins at different pHs; by in vivo tests using the increase of the sphinganine to sphingosine ratio in rat urine and tissues as a biomarker of fumonisin exposure; and by a dynamic, computer-controlled, gastrointestinal model simulating the gastrointestinal tract of healthy pigs. Most of the commercially available mycotoxin-binders failed in sequestering in vitro Fusarium mycotoxins. Only for a small number of adsorbent materials was the ability to bind more than one mycotoxin demonstrated. Cholestyramine was proven to be an effective binder for fumonisins and zearalenone in vitro, which was confirmed for zearalenone in experiments using a dynamic gastrointestinal model and for fumonisins in in vivo experiments. No adsorbent materials, with the exception of activated carbon, showed relevant ability in binding deoxynivalenol and nivalenol. The in vitro efficacy of activated carbon toward fumonisins was not confirmed in vivo by the biomarker assay. The dynamic gastrointestinal model was a reliable tool to study the effectiveness of adsorbent materials in reducing the bioaccessibility of Fusarium mycotoxins, as an alternative to the more difficult and time-consuming studies with domestic livestock.

Key Biomarkers

sphinganine to sphingosine ratio

Cited By (1)

  • Mycotoxin-degradation profile of Rhodococcus strainsInternational Journal of Food Microbiology · 2013

References (3)

  • In vitro and in vivo studies to assess the effectiveness of cholestyramine as a binding agent for fumonisinsMycopathologia · 2001
  • Dietary strategies to counteract the effects of mycotoxins: a reviewJournal of Food Protection · 2001
  • Assessing the zearalenone-binding activity of adsorbent materials during passage through a dynamic in vitro gastrointestinal modelFood and Chemical Toxicology · 2003

Related Papers

  • Metabolic profiling as a powerful tool for the analysis of cellular alterations caused by 20 mycotoxins in HepG2 cellsArchives of Toxicology · 2022 · 3 shared tags
  • Molds and mycotoxins indoors II: Toxicological perspectiveArchives of Clinical Toxicology · 2025 · 3 shared tags
  • 30+ years of knowledge creation: Indoor Air 1991–2021Indoor Air · 2022 · 3 shared tags
  • Aflatoxin B1 Toxicity and Protective Effects of Curcumin: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical ImplicationsAntioxidants · 2022 · 3 shared tags
  • Challenging Case in Clinical Practice: Identification and Treatment of Mycotoxin Illness Using an Environmental Medicine PerspectiveIntegrative and Complementary Therapies · 2023 · 3 shared tags
  • In Vitro Metabolism of Phenylspirodrimanes Derived from the Indoor Fungus StachybotrysToxins · 2022 · 3 shared tags